Hi, nique,
just to add something:
1. I missed that you work in LS 2.05. Regarding Tony this relevance only works in 2.06 and higher.
So maybe you could update to 2.06 to be able to keep your templates.
2. You surely have some reasons to design this question this way.
But let me ask:
Why isn't it sufficient to only have the answer option "Do you know...?"
Either the respondent checks if he knows, or does not check if he doesn't know.
Now there are two answer options which cannot be checked both.
And some respondents will think "What a stupid questionnaire".
What about a respondent who neither checks "I know" nor "I don't know"?
So you have to check that each of these alternative pairs contain an answer.
And what does a respondent check (c and d) who isn't involved at all?
Can't you change the design of this question to a matrix with answer options "Yes" and "No"?
Then it is IMHO sufficient to ask "Do you know...?"
And you will have an answer for each question.
Best regards
Joffm
just to add something:
1. I missed that you work in LS 2.05. Regarding Tony this relevance only works in 2.06 and higher.
So maybe you could update to 2.06 to be able to keep your templates.
2. You surely have some reasons to design this question this way.
But let me ask:
Why isn't it sufficient to only have the answer option "Do you know...?"
Either the respondent checks if he knows, or does not check if he doesn't know.
Now there are two answer options which cannot be checked both.
And some respondents will think "What a stupid questionnaire".
What about a respondent who neither checks "I know" nor "I don't know"?
So you have to check that each of these alternative pairs contain an answer.
And what does a respondent check (c and d) who isn't involved at all?
Can't you change the design of this question to a matrix with answer options "Yes" and "No"?
Then it is IMHO sufficient to ask "Do you know...?"
And you will have an answer for each question.
Best regards
Joffm